What is Collaborative Law?
Collaborative Law is one of the ways that provide an alternative to litigation in the courts to resolve family disputes and / or make arrangements about children, finances and other personal matters after separation or divorce.
The process of Collaborative Law is similar to mediation except that both parties have a solicitor present to represent and advise them during negotiations.
Collaborative law is well established in the US and Canada and first came to the UK in 2003. Since then many family solicitors have trained as collaborative lawyers organised by Resolution.
The Basics of Collaborative Law
The collaborative law model is based on all participants, the two parties and both lawyers, agreeing in writing not to go to court. A formal agreement is signed at the first meeting. This means that if one party later on decides to go to court after all, both solicitors have to stop acting and both parties have to change solicitors. The only exception would be in an emergency applications.
This is a strong incentive to stick to collaborative law, even if there is a sticky patch. Similar to mediation, all issues are discussed in meetings with the difference that there are four people instead of three, the two parties and their solicitors.
In most relationship breakdowns communication problems are the main or a contributory reason. This does of course create a major problem when right at the time when the parties find out that their communication problems have led to the breakdown of their relationship they have to communicate about a range of issues in order to disentangle their relationship. This is where others can help.
As in mediation, the two solicitors, who are trained as collaborative lawyers, will try to guide you so that you can communicate effectively and the discussion and the negotiations are conducted in a principled way.
At the same time, each lawyer can put your case forward and also give you advice. Sometimes the solicitors will give their advice in the meeting, so that both parties can hear how similar or different it is. If it is similar, the parties may be able to agree a point fast. If it is different, they can see that litigation may be a costly gamble because a judge may take one or the other or an altogether different view.
You can only collaborate if you both have solicitors who are trained collaborative lawyers. Therefore, if one of you has already instructed a solicitor who is not a collaborative lawyer and is unwilling to change to another solicitor, you cannot collaborate.
The Collaborative Law Process
You will first meet your solicitors so they can take instructions about your situation from you. If you then decide that you want to use collaborative law to try to resolve issues, you will have to ensure that your partner has also instructed or will instruct a collaborative lawyer.
If he or she has already done so and has also decided to try collaborative law, your solicitors can make contact and arrange the first meeting. If your partner has not yet instructed a lawyer, you would need to approach them to see if they are prepared to explore this option. Your solicitor would discuss with you about how that could best be done, for example, by you contacting your partner direct, meeting and discussing the option; leaving a leaflet for them at home or sending them a link to this website.
At the first meeting the solicitors will share it between them to go over the principles of collaborative law again and then everyone will sign the collaborative agreement.
The two solicitors will either meet or talk on the telephone to prepare each meeting and will set a flexible agenda. If financial issues are involved, they will schedule meetings so that you can prepare financial disclosure.
Issues are discussed over a series of several meetings, usually at the office of one or the other solicitor. This also mean that one solicitor will need to travel each time. Sometimes, the meetings will alternate between the offices.
Other than the financial disclosure the discussions in the meetings are privileged and confidential, and if the collaborative process was to break down, neither party would be allowed to refer to the discussions in later court proceedings. This allows everyone to talk freely and suggest options and proposals, they would otherwise maybe not put forward. Usually this leads to a faster conclusion.
Once you have come to an agreement on an issue, or all issues, your solicitors can share between them who will draft the documents, such as a financial consent order, and you can then use a further meeting to go through the draft and agree a final version to be sent to the court.
By comparison with mediation, more time is spent by the solicitors preparing each meeting with each other and each of their clients. The solicitors will also probably meet or talk on the telephone to their client after each meeting. This makes the process more expensive.
Where collaborative law has maybe a strength over mediation is that the two solicitors who will draft and agree a final version of the court papers have been part of the process and therefore will fully understand how you arrived there. There is less of a chance of matters becoming stuck at this stage. However, in mediation this danger can be reduced by choosing a good mediator and solicitors who understand the mediation process, who are perhaps themselves mediators.
Other professionals have trained in collaborative law so that they can support the process. Sometimes the solicitors may suggest that family coaches support each party. Accountants and financial advisers may help with valuations and the financial disclosure. The aim is also to reduce costs.
You could also agree to deal with certain issues, such as how much time your children spend with each of you (“contact”) in mediation, which could run in parallel to the collaborative law process.
Collaborative law does not work for everyone, for example if there is a history of bullying or violence. Generally, both partners have to be very committed and function well. If there is an inequality of knowledge or negotiating experience, the presence and support of the solicitors can help to prevent this from resulting in an outcome that each party does not fully agree to.
What are the Costs?
You will meet in as many sessions as are necessary. Both solicitors will charge for their time at an hourly rate including for travel. Your solicitor should be able to try to give you an estimate of costs at the beginning of the process. However, since they will not be able to know how many meetings it will take to come to an agreement, this may have to be revised later.
Generally the costs are considerably higher than those for mediation, not least because you have two lawyers coming to each meeting, with one travelling there. Broadly costs are probably comparable with those of litigation if an agreement is reached at or around the FDR hearing. Even in a straightforward case they are unlikely to be less than £8-15,000 or so for each party.
How to Find a Collaborative Lawyer
Not all family solicitors are trained and accredited collaborative lawyers so the easiest way to locate a trained collaborative lawyer is to contact using the form on this page.
Contact Us Today
Latest News, Stories and Information
RELATIONSHIP breakdowns or splits can be stressful at any time – but add children and Christmas into the mix, and the pressure on both parties will escalate. Whether you are on the brink of formally separating from a spouse or partner, or it is your first year apart, family lawyers from Buckles Solicitors LLP have some sensitive seasonal advice on coping [...]
Common law marriage splits explained What’s yours is mine - or is it? IT’S not every couple that can look forward to a Happy New Year – with January a popular month for moving on and moving out. A common time of year for divorces or calling it a day when it comes to broken relationships, family lawyers at [...]
FAMILY lawyers at Buckles Solicitors are urging unmarried, cohabiting couples to formalise their arrangements – in light of a recent landmark Supreme Court victory. The Court ruled a woman from Northern Ireland was entitled to claim for a survivor’s pension after her long-term, live-in partner died suddenly - shortly after they had become engaged. He had paid into Northern [...]